Legal Opinion
Gentry v. United Slate, Tile and Construction Roofers
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 25, 1974No. 1-174A12PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLybrook, J.
Plaintiff-appellant Gentry Industrial Services (Gentry) appeals from the granting of the motion to dismiss of defendant-appellees United Slate, Tile and Construction Roofers, Damp and Waterproof Workers Association, Anderson Local #250 (United) and James Harles. The single issue for our review is whether the trial court erred in sustaining appellees’ motion.
The record reveals that defendant Ralph Hunnicutt & Sons (Hunnicutt) was the general contractor of a project for the construction of an addition to the Chrysler Corporation Forge Division Plant at New Castle. Gentry, a partnership whose…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Juneau Spruce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- State v. RankinIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Austin Lakes Joint Venture v. Avon Utilities, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1995
- State Farm v. Shuman, Admx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Citizens National Bank v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Childs v. RayburnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Skyline Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Ziolkowski Construction, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.