Legal Opinion

Brostron v. Warmann

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 12, 1989No. 3-88-0835PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knecht

The nonparty movants, Becker Bros., Inc. (Becker), an Illinois construction firm, and Vickie W. Kovski (Kovski), its employee, appeal from an order of discovery entered in aid of an action pending in another jurisdiction. 107 Ill. 2d R. 204(b).

The facts of that action are not in dispute: In August of 1983, the plaintiff, Curtis Brostron (Brostron), and the defendant, Floyd C. Warmann (Warmann), entered into a general partnership to develop a nursing home project in Cedar Hill, Missouri. In turn, Warmann, as managing partner, entered into a contract with Becker to construct the project. In…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. v. BuaIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. La Salle National Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Monier v. ChamberlainIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  4. The Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  5. Transamerica Computer Company, Inc., and v. International Business MacHines Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MJ & Partners Restaurant Ltd. Partnership v. ZadikoffDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
  2. Maxwell v. Hobart Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Habitat Co. v. McClureAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Habitat Company v. McClureAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Maxwell v. Hobart Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API