Legal Opinion

Dillard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 21, 1915No. 3513PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was convicted of the offense of passing a forged instrument, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the State penitentiary.

The facts in this case would show that appellant traded some property in Oklahoma to R.H. Thompson, and in exchange therefor Thompson gave him a deed to some property in Oklahoma City; also a quit claim deed to 640 acres of land in Swisher County, Texas, described in the record as section No. 3 in block No. B-6, certificate No. 48. Mr. Thompson testified that he "would not say that he owned the Swisher County section when he sold it to Dillard,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CostelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  3. Williams v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Cagle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. Reeseman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Heath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Rutherford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Sumrall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API