Legal Opinion

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. South Carolina Tax Commission

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 21, 1989No. 1294PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Chief Judge:

Appellant Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. applied for a refund of property taxes from respondent South Carolina Tax Commission. Southern Bell claimed that it qualified for a reduced assessment of certain property pursuant to Section 12-43-220 of the Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, as amended. That section makes available a reduced assessment for certain property of manufacturers. The Tax Commission denied the claim on the ground that Southern Bell was not a manufacturer as defined by Section 12-37-1310. That section provides: “Every person engaged in making,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Dunton v. South Carolina Board of ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. McLeod v. MontgomerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  4. Mills v. South Carolina Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  5. Etiwan Fertilizer Co. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Canon School Dist. 50 v. Wes Const.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  2. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. Lexington County Health Services District v. South Carolina Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Planned Parenthood v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API