Legal Opinion

Franks v. Hubbard

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 2016No. ED 104797PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoy L. Richter, Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

This is an election contest1 arising out of the August 2, 2016 Primary Election (“the Election”) to nominate a Democratic candidate to serve the 78th State House District in the Missouri House of Representatives (“the 78th District”). Respondent Bruce Franks, Jr. (“Franks”) contends that 246 absentee ballots were improperly accepted and counted by the City of Saint Louis Board of Election Commissioners (“the Board”). Appellant Penny V. Hubbard (“Hubbard”) concedes 8 absentee ballots were unlawfully cast and should not count but she argues the other 238 votes were lawfully cast…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. National Federation of the Blind v. Linda LamoneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  3. Phyllis Griffin v. Elaine RoupasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Straughan v. MeyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  5. Maudlin v. LangSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Interest of: L.Q.F., A.E.D., D.G.F., J.S.F., L.T.K., and J.L.K.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Karla K. Allsberry, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Patrick S. Flynn, in his individual capacity, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2021
  3. Karla L. Allsberry, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Patrick S. Flynn, in his Individual CapacityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Missouri State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API