Legal Opinion

State v. Yoskowitz

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 19, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

116 N.J. 679 (1989)

563 A.2d 1

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

MARC YOSKOWITZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 17, 1989.

Decided July 19, 1989.

Carol M. Henderson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Marlene Yoskowitz argued the cause for respondent.

2Per curiam

Defendant, Marc Yoskowitz, arranged to have his automobile stolen so that he could collect insurance. On March 28, 1985, defendant pleaded guilty in Municipal Court, Livingston, Essex County, to the disorderly-persons offense of…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

3Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API