Legal Opinion

Guzman v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 25, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Straus, J.), entered July 23, 2002, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant New York City Housing Authority’s motion to dismiss the complaint for plaintiffs failure to comply with appellant’s demands for physical and oral examinations pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff provided a reasonable excuse for her failure to appear at the noticed examinations. Unlike the plaintiff in Best v City of New York (97 AD2d 389 [1983], affd 61 NY2d 847 [1984]), plaintiff here did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Best v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Best v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Jusino v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API