Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 16, 1966No. 7 Div. 725PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWYN, Justice.

This is a divorce case. The husband' brings the appeal from the decree granting the wife an absolute divorce.

*571There are si'x assignments of error. jSIonc of them is mentioned or referred to in appellant’s brief. Accordingly, they must be deemed waived. See: Anderson v. Smith, 274 Ala. 302, 303, 148 So.2d 243; Board of Registrars of Russell County v. Mathews, 274 Ala. 73, 76, 145 So.2d 799; Shelby County v. Hatfield, 264 Ala. 488, 489, 88 So.2d 842.

Aside from the foregoing, the argument purports to deal with all of the assignments of error together, that is, in bulk, without…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Frazier v. FrazierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Bolton v. Barnett Lumber & Supply CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Boles v. BonnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Anderson v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  5. Shelby County v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kinsaul v. Florala Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Astronautical Development Co. v. University of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co. v. McCleneyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Mabrey v. DicksonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Ray v. RayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API