Legal Opinion

Beatty v. Zeigel and Ellison

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1942Published

1Opinion

Opinion on Motion for Rehearing.

CAVE, J.

The burden of appellant’s complaint in her motion for rehearing is that respondents, being dissatisfied with appellant’s abstract of the record, filed an additional abstract and thereby waived any objections or complaint they had or could have had to appellant’s abstract. Suffice it to say that we have diligently searched our files and records and do not find anywhere an additional abstract of the record filed by respondents, o-r any record in this court showing that the same was filed. It may be true, as appellant asserts, that respondents had prepared…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coleman v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. State ex rel. Modern Woodmen of America v. BroaddusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. Watson v. KerrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  4. Warner v. HowardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API