Schulz v. Boyd

VAUGHAN,, J.

(dissenting).

The disposition made of the motion filed in this cause to strike the statement of facts from the record I agree with, but I am not in accord with that portion of the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice LOONEY beginning with the words “Judge Bush’s authority to hold court for Judge Rawlins” and ending with the sentence “just such a contingency is contemplated and provided for in article 2288, R. S. 1925, where, on the death of the regular judge it is made the duty of his successor to approve statements of facts and bills of exceptions in cases tried by the deceased,” and…