Legal Opinion
In Re Kelly
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 30, 2003No. 19-10346PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
MARY F. WALRATH, Bankruptcy-Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is the Amended Unsecured Judgment Creditors’ Objection under 11 U.S.C. § 522(1) to Property Claimed as Exempt under 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(2)(B). Kenneth Kelly (“the Debt- or”) claimed as exempt an interest he holds in real property with his second wife. Judgment creditors, the Law Office of David Staats, P.A., and David Staats, individually (collectively “Staats”) object to the claimed exemption and seek a declaration that the Debtor and his wife hold the property as tenants in common, not as tenants by the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Long v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Hurd v. HughesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roger Schlossberg, Trustee-Appellant v. Jean Barney, Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Musolino v. Sinnreich (In Re Sinnreich)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- David L. Banks v. Mackie H. BanksCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
- In Re GreathouseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Law Office of David Staats, P.A. v. Kelly (In Re Kelly)District Court, D. Delaware · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.