Davidson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON REHEARING.
February 21, 1923.
HAWKINS, Judge.
Appellant calls attention to the fact that under authority of McNeil v. State, 239 S. W. Rep., 954 and Guynes v. State, 242 S. W. Rep., 233, the judgment in the instant case should not have only been reversed, but the prosecution also ordered dismissed. The indictment having alleged the offense to have been committed, at a date prior to the amendment of the «Thirty-seventh legislature becoming effective, and failing to negative the exceptions under the old statute, the indictment fails to charge an offense.
Appellant’s motion is granted, and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Guynes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- McNeil v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922