Legal Opinion

Kingsbury v. Terry

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 27, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, and for damage to her automobile in which she was riding when it was in collision with an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. The bill of exceptions states that the evidence warranted a finding of negligence on the part of the defendant and also a finding of “either negligence or due care on the part ,of the plaintiff’s” eighteen year old daughter, Alice, who was operating the plaintiff’s automobile at the time of the collision. The jury could have found that on the Friday prior to the accident,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. DarmochwatMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Connelly v. Fellsway Motor Mart, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Country Club Soda Co. v. ArbuckleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Gately v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Guy v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lydon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Horowitz v. BokronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. Squires v. FraskaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Russell v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Sanjean v. HymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API