Tisbury v. Armstrong
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In this medical malpractice action, plaintiffs appeal as of right from an August 16, 1989, order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant James Armstrong, D.O. Plaintiffs claim that defendant was granted summary disposition after the trial court abused its discretion in denying their motions for an adjournment and for leave to amend their witness list. We agree and reverse.
The decision whether to allow a party to add an expert witness is within the discretion of the trial court. Butt v Giammariner, 173 Mich App 319, 321; 433 NW2d 360 (1988). The grant or denial of a motion for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Levinson v. SklarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Rosselott v. County of MuskegonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Butt v. GiammarinerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Sleeman v. Dickinson County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cox v. Eric J. Hartman, M.D., & Blue Water Obstetrics & Gynecology Prof'l Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- John Pugno v. Blue Harvest Farms LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- People v. DanielsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Angelina a Cox v. Eric J Hartman MdMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Bennena Roe v. Sebastian RoeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.