Legal Opinion

Benjamin Mentink v. Karen Downing

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 2013No. 45A03-1207-PO-332Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Mar 13 2013, 9:08 am ROBERT L. MEINZER, JR. Meinzer & Babineaux, LLC St. John, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA BENJAMIN MENTINK, ) ) Appellant-Respondent, ) ) vs. ) No. 45A03-1207-PO-332 ) KAREN DOWNING, ) ) Appellee-Petitioner. ) APPEAL FROM THE LAKE SUPERIOR COURT The Honorable Diane Kavadias Schneider, Judge Cause No.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Joslyn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API