Legal Opinion

Foiles v. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1913No. Docket No. 83PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Houghton; Streeter, J. Assumpsit by Ella Foiles against the Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance Company on a policy of fire insurance. Judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff brought suit upon a certain fire insurance policy issued to her by defendant for $500 upon a certain frame dwelling house located at South Range, in Houghton county. Plaintiff recovered judgment in the case upon a verdict instructed by the *718court in her favor against defendant for the amount of the policy, with interest. Defendant asks for a reversal of this judgment upon a writ of error.

This is one of three separate suits brought by the same plaintiff- against three insurance companies to recover for a total loss claimed upon this dwelling house and its contents. In the instant case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marthinson v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Mercantile Ins. v. HolthausMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. L. Terry v. American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Gourlay v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Goodman v. National Liberty Insurance Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Houran v. Ætna InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Foiles v. Dixie Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API