Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Jeff Lokey v. Mike Irwin

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2016No. S-15-0233Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBurke, Chief Justice

[¶ 17] I write separately because I disagree with the majority's determination that we lack jurisdiction. explained: We have previously

An appealable order is "[aln order affecting a substantial right in an action, when such order, in effect, determines the action and prevents a judgment[.]" WRAP. 1.05(a). "[A] judgment or order which determines the merits of the controversy and leaves nothing for future consideration is final and appealable, and it is. not appeal-able unless it. does those things." Public Service Commission v. Lower Valley Power, 608 P.2d 660, 661 (Wyo.1980).

Steele v. Neeman,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Broadhead v. BroadheadWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Public Service Commission v. Lower Valley Power & Light, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Brenda Miller, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Connie Rae ScribnerWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Steele v. NeemanWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Stone v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API