In re Oreck Corp. Halo Vacuum Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
TRANSFER ORDER
JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.
Before the Panel:* Three motions for centralization, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, are pending in these two dockets. In MDL No. 2317, defendant Oreck entities 1 (Oreck) move for centralization of all or parts of five actions in the Northern District of Illinois: two actions involving only claims concerning Oreck’s Halo vacuum cleaner (the Central District of California Latta and Northern District of Illinois Ruscitti actions) and the Halo-related claims in three other actions (the Central District of California Chenier and Edge actions and the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Medtronic, Inc., Implantable Defibrillators Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2005