Legal Opinion

In re Oreck Corp. Halo Vacuum Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided February 3, 2012No. MDL Nos. 2317, 2318Published

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel:* Three motions for centralization, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, are pending in these two dockets. In MDL No. 2317, defendant Oreck entities 1 (Oreck) move for centralization of all or parts of five actions in the Northern District of Illinois: two actions involving only claims concerning Oreck’s Halo vacuum cleaner (the Central District of California Latta and Northern District of Illinois Ruscitti actions) and the Halo-related claims in three other actions (the Central District of California Chenier and Edge actions and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Medtronic, Inc., Implantable Defibrillators Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API