Legal Opinion
Andrew v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided December 14, 1977No. 52674Published
1Concurrence 1
ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
2Concurrence · RobertsRoberts, Judge
I concur with the Court’s opinion on the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing. However, these are two additional grounds of error which require that this case be reversed.
I
During the trial, the trial judge admonished the appellant’s counsel as follows:
“THE COURT: Counsel, I think it is highly improper of you to criticize the jury.
*880“MR. ZIMMERMANN: Your Honor, I object to the Court’s comments.
“THE COURT: I object to your manner of argument. You shouldn’t tell the jury they couldn’t have read the charge in an hour and a half. It was read to them. They didn’t have…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.