Commonwealth v. Stein
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
The petition for allocatur consists of a xeroxed copy of a letter from petitioner to counsel, requesting counsel to file an allocatur petition. Since such a petition does not accord with counsel’s required role as an advocate, see Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674, 675, 78 S. Ct. 974, 975 (1958), the case must he remanded so that counsel may file a proper petition. See Commonwealth v. Stancell, 435 Pa. 301, 256 A. 2d 798 (1969); Pa. Supreme Ct. Rule 69 (petitions for allowance of appeal must set forth particularly the questions involved and the reasons in favor of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Commonwealth v. VillanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. StancellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. HoernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969