Legal Opinion

Moore v. Magor Car Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 19, 1958PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Feancis, J.

Certification was granted in this matter 25 N. J. 539, to review the adequacy of the fee allowed to petitioner’s counsel for services rendered in the Workmen’s Compensation Division.

The award of attorneys’ fees in workmen’s compensation proceedings at the hearing level is regulated by statute. Under N. J. 8. A. 34:15-64 a reasonable fee not exceeding 20% of the judgment may be allowed, subject to the limitation which is the source of this controversy and which will be discussed later.

One of the major objectives of the Workmen’s Compensation…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Daigle v. Great American Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. Government Emp. Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  3. B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Oldmans TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1997
  4. Commerce Bancorp v. Interarch, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  5. Xcel Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API