Legal Opinion

Pearlstein v. Blackberry Limited

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 3, 2022No. 1:13-cv-07060Unknown

1Opinion

| usbe SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | DOCUMENT □ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORE | | PLECTRONICALLY FILED | DOC #: MARVIN PEARLSTEIN, Individually And On | LDATE FILED: "(4 □ Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, enemas Plaintiff, No. 13 Civ. 7060 (CM) (KHP) (Consolidated) -against- BLACKBERRY LIMITED (formerly known as RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED), THORSTEN HEINS, BRIAN BIDULKA, and STEVE ZIPPERSTEIN, Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE McMahon, J.: In early 2013, BlackBerry Limited (“BlackBerry” or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Feingold v. New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. In re Vivendi, S.A. Secs. Litig.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  5. Davis v. New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API