Legal Opinion

Ridenour v. Jessamine County Fiscal Court

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 18, 1992No. 91-CA-1272-MRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYES, Judge:

The central questions in this appeal from the denial of a requested zoning change by *534the Jessamine Fiscal Court concern the violation of appellants’ rights to procedural due process, the alleged violation of Kentucky’s Open Meetings Act, and whether the evidence supported the action of the fiscal court.

The facts of this case are not complex and are largely undisputed. Appellants sought a zoning change from A-l (agricultural) to 1-1 (light industrial) for a 2.5 acre tract of land in Jessamine County. A full public hearing on this request was conducted on November 14, 1989, after…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  2. McKinstry v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
  3. Stinson v. State Board of AccountancyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brescia v. North Shore OhanaHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Brescia v. North Shore OhanaHawaii Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API