Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Board of Equalizers

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 20, 1922Published

1Dissent

Whitfield, J.,

Dissenting. — The decision in this case is, that although a statutory provision be unconstitutional and void, the highest executive officers of the State should e'xecute it until it is declared by the courts to' be invalid; and that the'Governor, Attorney General and State Treasurer cannot question the validity of an enactment in aii *604action to enforce it brought against such officers, with the result that a peremptory writ of mandamus is to command the Governor, the Attorney General and the State Treasurer to execute a provision of a statute which provision the highest executive…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. People ex rel. Sutherland v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. State ex rel. Holloway v. SheatsSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  5. Threadgill v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API