Sayers v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KISER, District Judge.
On October 10, 1989 the parties jointly filed a letter which raised the issue of this court’s jurisdiction in light of an amendment to the “amount in controversy” requirement to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Background
The pertinent facts for this opinion are quite simple. On May 4, 1989, the plaintiff filed suit in the Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke. On May 30, 1989, the defendant filed its petition to remove the case to federal court on the basis of diversity of citizenship. Both parties agree that in the case at bar the amount in controversy is more than…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Ben CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Don D. Maseda v. Honda Motor Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Lorraine Motors, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1958
- Kieffer v. TRAVELERS FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1958
- Sullivan v. MochenDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- Griffin v. HolmesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993
- Berkshire Fashions, Inc. v. The M.V. Hakusan IICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Natale v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Hatcher v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- Lane v. Champion International Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.