Halteman v. Russell

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Latimer

Reversing.

This appeal grows out of a continuation of the action following the former appeal and judgment in the ■case of Russell et al. v. Halteman’s Adm’x, 287 Ky. 404, 153 S. W. 2d 899. Subsequent to issuance of mandate therein, plaintiff filed amended reply in which she alleged that the contract, as set out in the opinion of the court in the above case, and entered into with H. P. Hicks, or Hicks-Brady Company, was not signed by her, and that at the time same was signed by J. A. Halteman he was incapable mentally of transacting business, and that his…