Legal Opinion
State v. Davidson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided October 29, 1985No. 8527SC373PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
Defendant contends there was insufficient evidence of separate confinement and restraint to satisfy N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-39, the kidnapping statute, and that the court thus should have granted his motion to dismiss the kidnapping charges. We disagree.
N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-39 provides, in pertinent part:(a) Any person who shall unlawfully confine, restrain, or remove from one place to another, any other person 16 years of age or over without the consent of such person . . . shall be guilty of kidnapping if such confinement, restraint or removal is for the purpose of:(2) Facilitating…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Joseph James Blake v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Pueblo v. Echevarría RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1991
- State v. DixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- Waymon Spriggs, Jr. v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.