Legal Opinion

Miller v. MacKey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 1927No. 26,327Published

1Per curiam

Appeal from a judgment entered after denial of defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante. There was no motion for a new trial. The sole question is the sufficiency of the evidence.

Plaintiff claims wages for doing housework for deceased in his lifetime. Deceased died September 4, 1925. His wife died in 1918. He was employed by the Pullman Company as its St. Paul superintendent, He had an office in the St. Paul Union Depot wherein plaintiff was employed as a telephone information clerk. She is a divorced woman with one son about 20 years old. She kept an apartment. Soon after the death of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. GleemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Neutgens v. RehmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API