Legal Opinion

Chatman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 3, 1993No. 606-92PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

WHITE, Judge.

A jury convicted appellant of murder and assessed punishment at confinement for forty-five years. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and ordered an acquittal. Chatman v. State, 830 S.W.2d 637 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1992). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to consider whether the Coiirt of Appeals was correct in finding the charge did not authorize the jury to convict under a parties theory and, therefore, the evidence was insufficient to support appellant’s conviction as a non-party.

Clarence Joseph…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Benson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. McCuin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Goff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. Skillern v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Plata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Vaughn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API