Legal Opinion

White v. Slayback

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the plaintiff, Flora MacDonald White, from two orders of the Supreme Court, made at the "New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 17th day of April, 1919, denying plaintiff’s separate motions for judgment on the pleadings, consisting of the amended complaint and demurrers thereto.

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.:

The pleadings consist of the complaint and of the demurrers of Slayback, Coyne and of Feitner, the same attorneys appear*565ing for Slayback and Coyne. Two orders were entered only. The plaintiff was doing business with the defendants as copartners in the stock brokerage business in the city of New York. She brings this action for conversion, in the sale of certain collateral which she held with the defendants for the purpose of protecting her "marginal account. The Special Term has held that the complaint did not state a cause of action. We are of opinion that taking the allegations of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. White v. SlaybackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API