Givens v. Dougherty
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentSpears, Justice
I respectfully dissent. The majority concedes the virtually unanimous critical view that an oral rescission of a contract within the Statute of Frauds ought to be enforceable. The majority refuses to follow this line, however, saying that it instead prefers to uphold the “well-established” Texas rule. Close analysis reveals, however, that there is no Texas authority governing this case, and that in fact all the cases cited by the majority are consistent with the strong scholarly position to the contrary.. There is no doubt that the prevailing rule outside of Texas is that such oral…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Denman v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- Dial v. CrainTexas Supreme Court · 1853
- Gardner v. SittigTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
- Reyes v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Yaeger v. Long Bros. Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941