Legal Opinion

In Re Odom

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado

Decided June 23, 2009No. 17-19741PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING CONFIRMATION OF PLAN

A. BRUCE CAMPBELL, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court, on application for confirmation, is the Debtors’ Chapter 13 Plan and the objection thereto filed by FIA Card Services aka Bank of America by eCAST Settlement Corporation as its Agent (“eCAST”). 1 The Debtors are “above median income” debtors and, consequently, are required by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (“BAPCPA”) to subtract from their income, the standardized expenses of 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(2), and to contribute income to a plan for a period of not less than 60 months. 11…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maney v. KagenveamaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Hamilton v. Lanning (In Re Lanning)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. In Re JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bernhardt v. Radloff (In Re Radloff)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API