Legal Opinion

Rolator v. King

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 25, 1903PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the Probate Court of Ohlahoma County; before Wm. P. Harper, Probate Judge, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of tbe court by

HaiNER, J.:

This is an action commenced in tbe probate court of Oklahoma county by tbe plaintiff in error, plaintiff in tbe court below, against the defendant in error, to recover $121 for professional services. At the same time the plaintiff caused a garnishment summons to issue to tbe Choctaw, Oklahoma, & Gulf Eailway Company, alleging that it had in its possession and control certain moneys belonging to the defendant. Afterwards the defendant moved to discharge the garnishment, on the ground that he is the head of a family, consisting of his mother and two sisters who…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roco v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Wade v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  3. Arnold v. WaltzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  4. State ex rel. Smythe v. KaneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. In Re Gathings' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. In re CondonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1912
  4. Wineblood v. PayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. McGaffey v. MulkySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API