Legal Opinion

Lascaris v. Shirley

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 19, 1975No. 73-1016PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

After our previous remand, 409 U. S. 1052 (1972), the three-judge District Court held that amended New York Social Services Law § 101-a “engraft[ed] ... a condition on to the Congressionally prescribed initial AFDC eligibility requirements or on to the grounds for discontinuance of benefits.” 365 P. Supp. 818, 821 (1973). That condition, the court held, rendered the amended section invalid because in conflict with the Social Security Act, § 402 (a), 42 U. S. C. § 602 (a), insofar as it required recipient cooperation in a paternity or support action against an absent parent as a condition of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SwankSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Carleson v. RemillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Holley v. LavineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. T____ H____ v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1975
  3. Wilson v. EdelmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. Venus Mandley v. James L. TrainorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  5. Doe v. PickettDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API