Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schenck v. TOWNSHIP OF CENTER

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 2009No. Appeal 5 WAP 2007Published

1DissentJustice Saylor

At issue in this appeal is whether the public’s right of access to invoices for attorney services paid for by the public may be defeated upon a mere blanket assertion of privilege. Given that the policy in the right-to-know landscape is rooted in promoting openness in government and the accessibility of information to the public, and because this Court is charged with the obligation of rendering reasoned decisions in light of such policy, I believe a more evaluative assessment of the claim of privilege is required.

In July 2003, Beverly Schenck (“Appellant”) sent to the Board of Supervisors of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. von Bulow v. von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Chaudhry v. GallerizzoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  3. Loigman v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. LaValle v. OFFICE OF GEN. COUNSEL OF COM.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Evening News Ass'n v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API