Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. Long
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtMaNTZ, J.
In its inception the controversy arose concerning the question of the installation of some kind of crossing protection at Central Avenue, Estherville, Iowa, where the same is crossed at grade by the Chicago, Eock Island & Pacific Eailroad Company, the complainant herein. We will refer to said railroad company as the Eock Island, or the railroad company. On the 28th day of June, 1948, the city council of Estherville passed a resolution wherein, among other things, it provided that the Eock Island be ordered and directed to place a flagman at said crossing, or to there erect and maintain…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. Mason City & Fort Dodge Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- State v. LawlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- O'Brien v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Smith v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Lowden v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Russell v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. LongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952