Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cage v. Township of Franklin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1899No. Appeal, No. 185Published

Appeal, No. 185, April T., 1898, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Greene Co., April T., 1896, No. 233, on verdict for plaintiff. Opinion by Rice, P. J. W. W. Porter, J., dissents. Trespass. Before Crawford, P. J. At tbe preceding argument of this appeal the judgment of the court below was affirmed, as will appear by the report of the case in 8 Pa. Superior Ct. 89, Rice, P. J., and Beaver, J.„ dissenting.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 185, April T., 1898, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Greene Co., April T., 1896, No. 233, on verdict for plaintiff. Opinion by Rice, P. J. W. W. Porter, J., dissents. Trespass. Before Crawford, P. J. At tbe preceding argument of this appeal the judgment of the court below was affirmed, as will appear by the report of the case in 8 Pa. Superior Ct. 89, Rice, P. J., and Beaver, J.„ dissenting. For statement of facts and arguments of counsél and the assignments of error in full reference may be had to the former report. The following are assignments of error sustained by the…

1DissentWilliam W. Pouter, J.

I dissent because nothing has been brought to my attention which changes the view of this case expressed by me in an opinion heretofore filed and reported, 8 Pa. Superior Ct. 89.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cage v. Township of FranklinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API