State Ex Rel. Rans v. St. Joseph Superior Court
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.
The relators ask for a writ of prohibition and mandate and request that the respondent court be required to expunge its record granting a motion for a new trial and granting a rehearing on its previous ruling denying the motion for a new trial. These motions and rulings arise in an action for personal injuries in which the relators, as plaintiffs, recovered a judgment for damages.
We previously issued an alternative writ of mandate to show cause and a temporary writ of prohibition against the respondent court.
The facts are that in the case of Vernon Rans, plaintiff v. Robert J. Krege,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dawson v. Wright, Mayor, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
- Clouser v. MockIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Vesey v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- McIntosh v. MONROEIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- City of Michigan City v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- James T. Mitchell v. 10th and The Bypass, LLC and Elway, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Cooper v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Estate of HammarIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- NEWTON v. Bd. of Tr. Vincennes UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
- In Re the Estate of WheatIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.