Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Rans v. St. Joseph Superior Court

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1964No. 30,624PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.

The relators ask for a writ of prohibition and mandate and request that the respondent court be required to expunge its record granting a motion for a new trial and granting a rehearing on its previous ruling denying the motion for a new trial. These motions and rulings arise in an action for personal injuries in which the relators, as plaintiffs, recovered a judgment for damages.

We previously issued an alternative writ of mandate to show cause and a temporary writ of prohibition against the respondent court.

The facts are that in the case of Vernon Rans, plaintiff v. Robert J. Krege,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Wright, Mayor, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Clouser v. MockIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Vesey v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. McIntosh v. MONROEIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  5. City of Michigan City v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. James T. Mitchell v. 10th and The Bypass, LLC and Elway, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Cooper v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Estate of HammarIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. NEWTON v. Bd. of Tr. Vincennes UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. In Re the Estate of WheatIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API