Legal Opinion

Sheridan v. Presas

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 15, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from judgment of the First District Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The action, which is in form for replevin, was originally instituted against the property clerk of the police department of the city of New York for the possession of two diamond *182rings and a scarf pin. The property clerk deposited the articles in court, and Salvador Presas and Manuel Plaza were substituted as defendants. The last named did not appear, and the suit was. défended by Presas alone. '

On the trial Presas made no claim to the pin, but contended and proved that the rings were his property and that he brought them from OaracaSj Venezuela; that when he came to this country he pawned…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Merritt v. . BartholickNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Craig v. . ParkisNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Munoz v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Wilson v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  5. Bryan v. . BaldwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gass v. SoutherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Treadwell v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Gass v. SoutherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. In re MillsNew York Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API