Legal Opinion

Miller v. Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde

Grand Ronde Tribal Court

Decided July 27, 2001No. C-00-07-013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*265ORDER AFFIRMING ENROLLMENT COMMITTEE DETERMINATION

KATHARINE ENGLISH, Chief Judge.

I.ISSUE PRESENTED

Petitioner is appealing the Enrollment Committee’s decision to deny his application for enrollment in the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon. Mr. Miller’s claims on appeal are (1) that the Tribe’s Constitutional Amendment was arbitrary and capricious, or in violation of federal law because it denies membership to all new applicants born between 1954 and 1983 and (2) that his constitutional due process rights were violated because the Enrollment Committee was negligent in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Confederated Tribes of Grand RondeGrand Ronde Tribal Court · 2004
  2. Norwest v. Confederated Tribes of Grand RondeGrand Ronde Tribal Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API