Legal Opinion
Morrow v. Igleburger
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided October 25, 1974No. Civ. No. C-3-74-93PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CARL B. RUBIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., filed by thirty-five defendants out of thirty-seven parties defendant. The parties have submitted motions, replies, supplemental memorada, affidavits, and exhibits in support of their respective positions. The essential determination in considering a Rule 12(b) (6) motion to dismiss is whether the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
The plaintiff brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. His…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leroy Thompson v. Parole Supervisor Burke, Pennsylvania Parole Board Member Jefferson, and Parole Agent StricklerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- John W. Timson v. Craig Wright, Judge, Court of Common Pleas of Franklin CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- McDaniel v. RhodesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
- Love v. DuckworthDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1983
- Phillips v. FisherDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.