Legal Opinion

Opp v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 13, 2000No. LUBA No. 2000-001; CA A110946Published

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

In November 1996, the Portland City Council approved a conditional use permit for a community center in a public park area. During a recess in the council’s proceedings on the permit application, Mike Lindberg, then a member of the council, conversed briefly with a person in the audience, Cooley. Petitioner, an opponent of the application, appealed to LUBA. She contended, inter alia, that Lindberg’s conversation with Cooley constituted an ex parte contact that was not disclosed on the record and that opponents were not given an opportunity to rebut. LUBA remanded the case to the city council…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Horizon Construction, Inc. v. City of NewbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Opp v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Schwerdt v. City of CorvallisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API