Legal Opinion

In re Faith

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided November 3, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hartshorne, C. P. J.

The applicant, “Love Eaith,” applies to the court “for the purpose of obtaining an order entitling him (her) to vote,” R. S. 19:32-18; N. J. S. A. 19:32-18, in view of the fact that the superintendent has issued an order to the District Board to refuse to allow her to vote. R. S. 19:32-15; N. J. S. A. 19:32-15. This section provides that “the superintendent shall investigate all registry lists prior to the holding of any election.” Having-done so, he noted that the appellant had registered in the name of “Love Eaith” and inquired from her as to her ordinary or previous…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schaffer v. Levenson Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1974
  2. Married Women's Registration, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API