Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ryan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1978No. 1807PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant, the Commonwealth, contends that the lower court erred in quashing a search warrant and suppressing all evidence seized following its execution. We agree and reverse the order of the lower court.

The facts of the instant case are not in dispute: At approximately 1:30 a. m., on March 1, 1977, Squire Earl Ammerman, the issuing authority 1 for Monroe County Magisterial District 43-3-02, issued a warrant to search premises located within Monroe County, but outside of his magisterial district. The search of the house yielded evidence which led to the instant prosecution.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. DeFeliceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. ShaheenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RyanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. RyanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. RyanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. YannarielloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API