Legal Opinion
Tammy Schofield v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 21, 2020No. 18-11390PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Case: 18-11390 Document: 00515319133 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-11390 February 21, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk TAMMY RAYE SCHOFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Before ELROD, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. * ANDREW S. OLDHAM, Circuit Judge: The Social Security Administration (“SSA”) denied Tammy Raye Schofield’s application for…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Ana B. Molina Gonzalez v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2025
- Avivia B. v. Frank J. Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2026
- Boyd v. KijakaziDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2023
- Byron Keith Tatum, II v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2026
- CASTILLO v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.