Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Cohen

Superior Court of Buffalo

Decided July 30, 1895Published

Appeal from a judgment, dismissing the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

The only question presented bjr counsel for the court’s consideration on this appeal is that the contract sued upon is void by the statute of frauds. The complaint sets forth a cause of action for materials furnished, and work, labor, and services performed by plaintiff for defendant, at his request, in and about the building of a house at 23 Union street, in the city of Buffalo. The answer is a general denial. Upon the trial, defendant sought to amend his answer by a plea of the statute of frauds. This was denied, and the case is therefore to be disposed of on the issue as originally framed.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mallory v. . GillettNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Crane v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Wells v. . MonihanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. King v. DespardNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  5. Devlin v. WoodgateNew York Supreme Court · 1861

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API