Mingledorff v. VAUGHAN REGIONAL MEDICAL
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Is the use of property owned by a nonprofit corporation organized under the laws of Alabama and operated and used by that nonprofit corporation exclusively as a hospital a use that is "exclusively" or "purely" charitable, so as to qualify for an exemption from the payment of ad valorem taxes under Amendment 373(k) of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901 and Ala. Code 1975, § 40-9-1(1)? We hold that it is; therefore, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Amendment 373(k) provides in pertinent part that "property devoted exclusively to . . . charitable purposes" is exempt from ad valorem…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Helvering v. BlissSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Eagerton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Community Memorial Hospital v. City of MoberlySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society v. County of GageNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
- Richards v. Iowa Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Patterson v. Gladwin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- City of Bessemer v. McClainSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Monroe v. Valhalla Cemetery Company, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- State v. Tuskegee UniversitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Monroe v. Baptist Health Care FoundationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.