Legal Opinion · Dissent

Garry v. Domino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 18, 1957Published

1Dissent

Kimball, J. (dissenting).

In July, 1955, when this matter was first before us (Matter of Garry v. Kocialski, 286 App. Div. 314) we called attention to the provision of section 188-f of the Village Law, which provides: “Such charges shall not be brought more than sixty days after the time when the facts upon which such charges are based are known to the board of trustees or municipal board.” In September, 1956, the matter was again before us (Matter of Garry v. Domino, 2 A D 2d 832). At that time we again called attention to section 188-f of the Village Law and stated: “ The Board of Trustees…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Garry v. KocialskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API