Legal Opinion
Eighth Avenue Coach Corp. v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1939PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotillo, J.
These two actions, for the same relief and based on the same fundamental facts, were consolidated for trial. Both plaintiffs seek to restrain the defendants from making or enforcing a regulation proposed by the defendant police commissioner which if effective would permit only south-bound traffic on Eighth avenue from Fifty-seventh street to Bethune street, and only north-bound traffic on Ninth avenue from Fourteenth to Fifty-ninth street and on Columbus avenue from Fifty-ninth street to Sixty-fourth street.
The plaintiff coach corporation predicates its right to permanent injunctive relief…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- International Products Co. v. Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Fleischman v. . FurguesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. City of South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Walker v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Texas Power & Light Company v. City of GarlandTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Painter v. State, Department of RoadsNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Louis Moorer v. State of South Carolina and Ellis C. MacDougall Director, South Carolina State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Eighth Avenue Coach Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.