Legal Opinion
David Raymond Durham v. Carl Zenon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 13, 1992No. 91-35312Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
953 F.2d 1386
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
David Raymond DURHAM, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Carl ZENON, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 91-35312.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Jan. 6, 1992.
Decided Jan. 29, 1992.
As Amended on Denial of Rehearing
May 13, 1992.
1
Before JAMES R. BROWNING, D.W. NELSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges
2
MEMORANDUM*
3
David Durham…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Gary HalbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Robert Lee Norris v. Henry Risley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.